|
BE MINDFUL |
|
 |
What is Holistic Lifestyle
Coaching?
Holistic Lifestyle
Coaching includes improving health from the ground up using
the Foundations of Health Principles. This enables
optimization and re-balancing of the all the body’s
fundamental control systems.
The Benefits of Holistic
Lifestyle Coaching are:
- Achieving optimal
weight and vitality
- Avoiding disease and
living a long and healthy life
- Achieving optimal
sports performance
- Avoiding and
recovering from injuries quickly
What’s Involved?
Holistic Lifestyle
Coaching includes:
- Detailed
pre-screening and assessments (1-2 hours)
- Program advice and
coaching (45 min - 2 hour sessions)
- Periodical
re-evaluation
Pre-screening
- A Holistic
Lifestyle Assessment is
carried out which assesses your goals, willingness to
change, medical history, hydration levels, dietary
habits, stress, toxicity, internal organ, hormonal and
emotional factors.
Assessments:
- Assessment of your
Metabolic Type to find out which foods are right for
you.
- Questionnaire
regarding your overall lifestyle habits including stress
levels, emotional balance, and coping mechanisms.
Evaluation:
The results of the
assessments are evaluated and an appropriate lifestyle plan
is devised. The use of other health care professionals are
also considered to ensure your success.
Program Coaching:
You are then ‘coached’
through a nutritional and lifestyle program. The
Holistic Lifestyle Coaching is normally carried out over
several sessions to ensure adherence and success. In
addition to dietary concerns, you will also be "coached" on
stress relieving techniques and steps you may want to
consider in an effort to achieve your goals.
Re-evaluation:
Just like you would have
your car serviced, it is recommended that you should be
re-assessed on a periodical basis to continue to achieve and
maintain optimal health.
|
|
Weekly Health Tip
By Dakota
If you need a sweetener,
use Sugar in the Raw, organic cane sugar or Stevia, a natural sugar
substitute. Avoid at all costs anything that comes in a pink, yellow or
blue packet or refined bleached sugar. If you want to know the truth
about Splenda, check out this website,
www.splendaexposed.com
View Past Tips
coming soon |
Dakota Walker Becomes a Holistic Lifestyle Coach
press release 2007
“Knowledge is not power,
applied knowledge is power. “
Paul Chek, HHP, NMT
SAN DIEGO, CA: More and more, the desire to get in
shape and to stay healthy involves enlisting the help of a personal
trainer of lifestyle coach. Dozens of organizations in the fitness
industry now issue certifications to each, promising competency with
those certified. But what
makes one certification better than the other? And most importantly, who
gets lasting results?
Now, a revolutionary approach to health, fitness, and increased vitality
has arrived.
Dakota, a Massage Therapist and Holographic health Practitioner,
recently became certified as a CHEK Holistic
Lifestyle Coach Level I, using the cutting-edge techniques of
world-renowned
Holistic Health Practitioner and certified Neuromuscular Therapist Paul
Chek; founder of the C.H.E.K Institute in San Diego, CA. Chek, a
sought-after teacher and speaker, has had unparalleled success using his
holistic approach in rehabilitation and conditioning for over 18 years.
To become a CHEK HLC, Dakota attended the CHEK Holistic Lifestyle Coach
Certification Module in August of 2007. This program combines an
intensive study of the relationship between food and lifestyle habits
and the tools to recognize and create individualized eating plans to
improve their client’s health and overall wellness. In addition, a CHEK
Holistic Lifestyle Coach understands the important roles that sleep,
food quality, stress reduction techniques, and exercise play in
improving the health of their clients and learn practical methods that
initiate valuable lifestyle changes.
In combing Holographic Health, and Massage Therapy and
now Holistic Lifestyle Coaching, Dakota is able to provide a more
rounded and balanced session for her clients.
|
Health Articles
Doctors 3rd
Leading Cause of Death
Diet Drinks Linked to
Heart Disease
Drink More Water
Artificial Sweeteners Linked to Weight Gain |
|
Holistic Lifestyle Coaching
Services
|
I ask clients for a minimum one
month commitment. It is nearly impossible to make lifestyle
changes on one session alone. |
One Month Program
$350
(includes assessments, and 3 one hour sessions)
Three Month Program
$600
(includes assessments, and 6 one hour sessions)add
a Field Trip for $45
Six Month Program
$850
(includes assessments, and 9 one hour sessions)
add a Field Trip for $45
Field Trip
|
Learn how to shop healthy with a field trip session. I will
show you how to read labels, foods to avoid, what to look for
and even the best places to shop for certain things. |
$75
(includes an hour session at a local store) |
|
Related Books
Eat Healthy, Stay
Balanced
Paul Chek
|
|
Health Articles
|
|
This article in the Journal of the American Medical
Association (JAMA) is the best article I have ever seen written in the
published literature documenting the tragedy of the traditional medical
paradigm.
This information is a follow-up of the Institute of
Medicine report which hit the papers in December of last year, but the
data was hard to reference as it was not in peer-reviewed journal. Now
it is published in JAMA which is the most widely circulated medical
periodical in the world.
The author is Dr. Barbara Starfield of the Johns
Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health and she describes how the US
health care system may contribute to poor health.
ALL THESE ARE DEATHS PER YEAR:
- 12,000 -----unnecessary surgery
8
- 7,000 -----medication errors in hospitals
9
- 20,000 ----other errors in hospitals
10
- 80,000 ----infections in hospitals
10
- 106,000 ---non-error, negative effects of
drugs 2
These total to 250,000
deaths per year from iatrogenic causes!!
What does the word iatrogenic mean? This term is
defined as induced in a patient by a physician's activity, manner, or
therapy. Used especially of a complication of treatment.
Dr. Starfield offers several warnings in interpreting
these numbers:
- First, most of the data are derived from studies
in hospitalized patients.
- Second, these estimates are for deaths only and
do not include negative effects that are associated with disability
or discomfort.
- Third, the estimates of death due to error are
lower than those in the IOM report.1
If the higher estimates are used, the deaths due to
iatrogenic causes would range from 230,000 to 284,000. In any case,
225,000 deaths per year constitutes the third leading cause of death in
the United States, after deaths from heart disease and cancer. Even if
these figures are overestimated, there is a wide margin between these
numbers of deaths and the next leading cause of death (cerebrovascular
disease).
Another analysis 11 concluded that between 4% and 18%
of consecutive patients experience negative effects in outpatient
settings, with:
- 116 million extra physician visits
- 77 million extra prescriptions
- 17 million emergency department visits
- 8 million hospitalizations
- 3 million long-term admissions
- 199,000 additional deaths
- $77 billion in extra costs
The high cost of the health care system is considered
to be a deficit, but seems to be tolerated under the assumption that
better health results from more expensive care.
However, evidence from a few studies indicates that as
many as 20% to 30% of patients receive inappropriate care.
An estimated 44,000 to 98,000 among them die each year
as a result of medical errors.2
This might be tolerated if it resulted in better
health, but does it? Of 13 countries in a recent comparison,3,4
the United States ranks an average of 12th (second from the bottom) for
16 available health indicators. More specifically, the ranking of the US
on several indicators was:
- 13th (last) for low-birth-weight percentages
- 13th for neonatal mortality and infant mortality
overall
14
- 11th for post-neonatal mortality
- 13th for years of potential life lost (excluding
external causes)
- 11th for life expectancy at 1 year for females,
12th for males
- 10th for life expectancy at 15 years for females,
12th for males
- 10th for life expectancy at 40 years for females,
9th for males
- 7th for life expectancy at 65 years for females,
7th for males
- 3rd for life expectancy at 80 years for females,
3rd for males
- 10th for age-adjusted mortality
The poor performance of the US was recently confirmed
by a World Health Organization study, which used different data and
ranked the United States as 15th among 25 industrialized countries.
There is a perception that the American public
"behaves badly" by smoking, drinking, and perpetrating violence."
However the data does not support this assertion.
- The proportion of females who smoke ranges from
14% in Japan to 41% in Denmark; in the United States, it is 24%
(fifth best). For males, the range is from 26% in Sweden to 61% in
Japan; it is 28% in the United States (third best).
- The US ranks fifth best for alcoholic beverage
consumption.
- The US has relatively low consumption of animal
fats (fifth lowest in men aged 55-64 years in 20 industrialized
countries) and the third lowest mean cholesterol concentrations
among men aged 50 to 70 years among 13 industrialized countries.
These estimates of death due to error are lower than
those in a recent Institutes of Medicine report, and if the higher
estimates are used, the deaths due to iatrogenic causes would range from
230,000 to 284,000.
Even at the lower estimate of 225,000 deaths per year,
this constitutes the third leading cause of death in the US, following
heart disease and cancer.
Lack of technology is certainly not a contributing
factor to the US's low ranking.
- Among 29 countries, the United States is second
only to Japan in the availability of magnetic resonance imaging
units and computed tomography scanners per million population. 17
- Japan, however, ranks highest on health, whereas
the US ranks among the lowest.
- It is possible that the high use of technology in
Japan is limited to diagnostic technology not matched by high rates
of treatment, whereas in the US, high use of diagnostic technology
may be linked to more treatment.
- Supporting this possibility are data showing that
the number of employees per bed (full-time equivalents) in the
United States is highest among the countries ranked, whereas they
are very low in Japan, far lower than can be accounted for by the
common practice of having family members rather than hospital staff
provide the amenities of hospital care.
Journal American Medical
Association Vol 284 July 26, 2000
COMMENT BY AUTHOR:
Folks, this is what they call a "Landmark Article". Only several ones
like this are published every year. One of the major reasons it is so
huge as that it is published in JAMA which is the largest and one of the
most respected medical journals in the entire world. I did find it most
curious that the best wire service in the world, Reuter's, did not pick
up this article. I have no idea why they let it slip by.
I would encourage you to bookmark this article and
review it several times so you can use the statistics to counter the
arguments of your friends and relatives who are so enthralled with the
traditional medical paradigm. These statistics prove very clearly that
the system is just not working. It is broken and is in desperate need of
repair.
I was previously fond of saying that drugs are the
fourth leading cause of death in this country. However, this article
makes it quite clear that the more powerful number is that doctors are
the third leading cause of death in this country killing nearly a
quarter million people a year. The only more common causes are cancer
and heart disease. This statistic is likely to be seriously
underestimated as much of the coding only describes the cause of organ
failure and does not address iatrogenic causes at all.
Japan seems to have benefited from recognizing that
technology is wonderful, but just because you diagnose something with
it, one should not be committed to undergoing treatment in the
traditional paradigm. Their health statistics reflect this aspect of
their philosophy as much of their treatment is not treatment at all, but
loving care rendered in the home.
Care, not treatment, is the answer. Drugs, surgery and
hospitals are rarely the answer to chronic health problems. Facilitating
the God-given healing capacity that all of us have is the key. Improving
the diet, exercise, and lifestyle are basic. Effective interventions for
the underlying emotional and spiritual wounding behind most chronic
illness are also important clues to maximizing health and reducing
disease.
Related Articles:
Medical Mistakes Kill 100,000 per year
US Health Care System Most Expensive in the World
Drug Induced Disorders
Author/Article Information
Author Affiliation: Department of Health Policy and
Management, Johns Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health,
Baltimore, Md. Corresponding Author and Reprints: Barbara Starfield, MD,
MPH, Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins School of
Hygiene and Public Health, 624 N Broadway, Room 452, Baltimore, MD
21205-1996 (e-mail: bstarfie@jhsph.edu).
REFERENCES
1. Schuster M, McGlynn E, Brook R. How good is the
quality of health care in the United States?
Milbank Q. 1998;76:517-563.
2. Kohn L, ed, Corrigan J, ed, Donaldson M, ed. To Err Is Human:
Building a Safer Health System. Washington, DC: National Academy Press;
1999.
3. Starfield B. Primary Care: Balancing Health Needs, Services, and
Technology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1998.
4. World Health Report 2000. Available at:
http://www.who.int/whr/2000/en/report.htm. Accessed June 28, 2000.
5. Kunst A. Cross-national Comparisons of Socioeconomic Differences
in Mortality. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Erasmus University; 1997.
6. Law M, Wald N. Why heart disease mortality is low in France: the
time lag explanation. BMJ. 1999;313:1471-1480.
7. Starfield B. Evaluating the State Children's Health Insurance
Program: critical considerations.
Annu Rev Public Health. 2000;21:569-585.
8. Leape L.Unecessarsary surgery.
Annu Rev Public Health. 1992;13:363-383.
9. Phillips D, Christenfeld N, Glynn L. Increase in US medication-error
deaths between 1983 and 1993.
Lancet. 1998;351:643-644.
10. Lazarou J, Pomeranz B, Corey P. Incidence of adverse drug
reactions in hospitalized patients.
JAMA. 1998;279:1200-1205.
11. Weingart SN, Wilson RM, Gibberd RW, Harrison B. Epidemiology and
medical error.
BMJ. 2000;320:774-777.
12. Wilkinson R. Unhealthy Societies: The Afflictions of Inequality.
London, England: Routledge; 1996.
13. Evans R, Roos N. What is right about the Canadian health system?
Milbank Q. 1999;77:393-399.
14. Guyer B, Hoyert D, Martin J, Ventura S, MacDorman M, Strobino D.
Annual summary of vital statistics1998.
Pediatrics. 1999;104:1229-1246.
15. Harrold LR, Field TS, Gurwitz JH. Knowledge, patterns of care, and
outcomes of care for generalists and specialists.
J Gen Intern Med. 1999;14:499-511.
16. Donahoe MT. Comparing generalist and specialty care: discrepancies,
deficiencies, and excesses.
Arch Intern Med. 1998;158:1596-1607.
17. Anderson G, Poullier J-P. Health Spending, Access, and Outcomes:
Trends in Industrialized Countries. New York, NY: The Commonwealth Fund;
1999.
18. Mold J, Stein H. The cascade effect in the clinical care of
patients.
N Engl J Med. 1986;314:512-514.
19. Shi L, Starfield B. Income inequality, primary care, and health
indicators.
J Fam Pract. 1999;48:275-284.
TOP
|
Diet Soda Linked to Heart
Disease
Eating two or more servings a day of red meat increases your risk of
metabolic syndrome by 25 percent, compared to those who have two
servings of red meat each week, a new study found.
Drinking diet soda also increased the risk of metabolic syndrome.
Metabolic syndrome is a cluster of risk factors such as excessive fat
around your waist, high cholesterol, high blood sugar and high blood
pressure, all of which can raise your risk of heart disease and
diabetes.
The researchers examined the diets of over 9,500 people between the ages
of 45 and 64. They were categorized into two groups: a “western-pattern
diet” that included processed meat, fried foods and red meat, or a
“prudent-pattern diet” that included more fruits and vegetables, poultry
and fish.
They concluded that lots of meat, fried foods and diet soda increase
your risk of heart disease.
Sources:
From Dr. Mercola's website,
www.mercola.com
© Copyright
2005 Dr. Joseph Mercola. All Rights Reserved. This content may be
copied in full, with copyright, contact, creation and information
intact, without specific permission, when used only in a
not-for-profit format.
TOP
Drink More Spring
or Filtered Water to Improve Every Facet of Your Health
You've heard it
repeatedly: make sure you drink at least eight 8-ounce glasses of
water per day. The key words are "at least," because, unless you are
a child or the size of a child, you need more water than that. The
rule of thumb is, for every 50 pounds of body weight you carry,
drink one quart of bottled spring or filtered water per day. The
average person weighs 150lbs, so they should drink three quarts per
day. A 200lb person should drink a full gallon per day. Athletes
should drink even more than that. Follow these guidelines and you've
adopted one of the most crucial health habits.
Our bodies are
mostly water, and so this ongoing intake of water is essential to
our every function. Drink the appropriate amounts, and everything is
much more likely to function at optimal levels. Don't drink enough
water, and over the short term you will experience routine fatigue,
dry skin, headaches and constipation; over the longer term, every
body function will degrade more quickly. It really is as simple as
that.
Things get a bit
more complicated in what type of water to drink. Bottled spring
water and filtered water are both good options. Do not drink tap
water or distilled water.
The spring (not
"drinking") water should be bottled in clear polyethylene or glass
containers, not the one-gallon plastic (PVC) containers that
transfer far too many chemicals into the water. Filtered water can
be obtained through low-cost filters, such as those provided by
Brita or PUR brands. Another recommendation of mine is the GE Smart
Water, which was top rated in Consumer Reports December 2002.
Tap water should
be avoided because it contains chlorine and may contain fluoride,
toxic substances that, with ongoing consumption, can have dire
consequences for the body. Distilled water should also be avoided
because it has the wrong ionization, pH, polarization and oxidation
potentials, and can drain your body of necessary minerals. It has
been tied to hair loss, which is often associated with certain
mineral deficiencies.
Finally, drink
water at room temperature if possible, as ice-cold water can harm
the delicate lining of your stomach.
Read more about
the benefits and right types of water -- and beverages to avoid --
in the eating plan. You can also use our powerful search tool, or
explore some of the links below.
Finally, the
extensively researched and fascinating book, Your Body's Many Cries
for Water, should be required reading by all, and definitely belongs
on every health care practitioner's bookshelf.
From Dr. Mercola's website,
www.mercola.com
© Copyright
2005 Dr. Joseph Mercola. All Rights Reserved. This content may be
copied in full, with copyright, contact, creation and information
intact, without specific permission, when used only in a
not-for-profit format.
TOP
Artificial
Sweeteners Linked to
Weight Gain
Foods and beverages
that contain no-calorie artificial sweeteners may be ruining your
ability to control your food intake and body weight, according to
new research by psychologists at Purdue University’s Ingestive
Behavior Research Center.
In their study, when compared with rats that ate yogurt sweetened
with glucose (a simple sugar), rats that ate yogurt sweetened with
the zero-calorie artificial sweetener saccharin:
-
Consumed more calories (and didn’t make up for it by
cutting back later)
-
Gained more weight
-
Put on more body fat
It’s thought that
consuming artificial sweeteners breaks the connection between a
sweet sensation and a high-calorie food, thereby changing your
body’s ability to regulate intake.
The researchers also measured the rats’ core body temperatures,
which typically rise after eating. However, after eating a sweet,
high-calorie meal, rats that ate saccharin had a lower rise in body
temperature than rats that ate glucose.
The researchers believe that this blunted biological response led
the rats to overeat, and made it harder to burn off the calories
later.
They concluded that consuming foods sweetened with saccharin would
lead to greater weight gain and body fat than eating the same foods
sweetened with sugar.
Although further research needs to be done, the researchers believe
that consuming other artificial sweeteners such as aspartame,
sucralose, and acesulfame K would have similar effects.
Sources:
-
Behavioral
Neuroscience February 2008, Vol. 122, No. 1, 161-173
From Dr. Mercola's website,
www.mercola.com
© Copyright
2005 Dr. Joseph Mercola. All Rights Reserved. This content may be
copied in full, with copyright, contact, creation and information
intact, without specific permission, when used only in a
not-for-profit format.
TOP
|
| |
 |
|
"People
often say that motivation doesn't last. Well, neither does bathing -
that's why we recommend it daily."
- Zig Ziglar
~
If opportunity doesn't knock,
build a door.
- Milton Berle
~
"There are no great things,
only small things with great love. Happy are those."
- Mother Teresa
~
Life's more amusing than we
thought.
-Andrew Lang
~
All that we
are is the result of what we have thought. The mind is
everything. What we think, we become.
- Maharishi Mahesh Yogi
~
Here is the test to find
whether your mission on earth is finished: If you're alive,
it isn't.
-Richard Bach
~
Knowledge is structured in
consciousness. The process of education takes place in the
field of consciousness; the prerequisite to complete
education is therefore the full development of consciousness
-enlightenment. Knowledge is not the basis of enlightenment,
enlightenment is the basis of knowledge.
- Maharishi Mahesh Yogi
~
There can
be hope only for a society which acts as
one big family, not as many separate ones.
- Anwar el Sadat
~
You really can change
the world if you care enough.
- Marion Wright Edelman
~
The mediocre teacher
tells. The good teacher explains. The superior teacher demonstrates.
The great teacher inspires.
- William Arthur Ward
~
I have yet
to meet a single person from our culture, no matter what his or her
educational background, IQ, and specific training, who had powerful
transpersonal experiences and continues to subscribe to the
materialistic monism of Western science.
- Albert Einstein
~
...perhaps there is a
pattern set up in the heavens for
one who desires to see it, and having seen it,
to find one in himself.
-
Plato
|
|